Skip to main content

A Brief Case for Self-Respect

Of the many concepts that are ethically important, one is incredibly valuable in this age of inflated self-importance and unhealthy narcissism: genuine self-respect.

What is "genuine" self-respect? It is, more correctly, just "self-respect", but needs to have the qualifier to distinguish it from fraudulent self-respect: that which is proposed by the self-help circles and certain religious traditions.

These forms of fraudulent self-respect are called "self-respect", "self-esteem" "unconditional positive self-regard", etc, but amount to an unhealthy psychological concept called narcissism.

Narcissism vs. self-respect is a debate which seems too muddy to consider, but can be distilled into key similarities and differences.
  • Similarities include the focus of both concepts on what the self is, what the self does, and why the self does what it does.
  • Differences arise from the different answers to these questions.
So, while a narcissistic line of thinking and a self-respecting line of thinking begin with the same starting point, they end in two disparate locations. 

Narcissism is a failed way of thinking because it requires no integrity, no love for yourself, no conscious valuing of principles, and importantly, no thought. It takes any input of behavior or thought and converts it into an output of "that was good". 

Everything you do is good, so nothing you do is good enough (because you have no differentiation between categories, they become too generalized to be useful). This leads to frustration and resentment. Your satisfaction becomes dim and you seek highs of emotional experience, through coercing others, failing to accept reality, and diminishing your own worth. 

Self-respect is a successful way of thinking because it is an effect of a determinable cause. Have you lived up to your higher principles? The reward is a degree of self-respect. Are you consistent in doing so? The reward is more self-respect. Are these principles applied consistently across time and across situations? The reward is even greater self-respect. It creates a positive feedback loop, in which satisfaction with one's life and character is followed by even greater satisfaction. 

The primary difference between implementing these two (narcissism and self-respect) can be paraphrased from Yoda, the character from Star Wars. When teaching the protagonist, Luke, about the difference between the good and evil, he claims that evil is not more powerful, but easier and more seductive. The same is true for narcissism; it is easier to think less, and harder to think more.

Self-respect requires thought, effort, consistency, and objective principles. The reward is lasting and self-sustaining joy. Narcissism requires little effort, thought, consistency or principle, and the reward is self-destruction. 

Which is preferable?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life is Not Suffering

I spent my childhood learning about God. What he wanted from us humans, and how we could give it to him. What we were saddled with from birth: sin. Like with other religious sects, I grew up believing in my inherent imperfection. I grew up with the belief that  life was suffering, and we had to make meaning from it. We would fail, constantly, and never live up to the standards God set for us, so we had to hope for the future. Through God's power alone could the world be set aright. Only through God's grace could we ever be forgiven. Jesus is the epitome of this viewpoint: His one time death was the only thing needed to release all men from sin and death. (Now, being Protestant, my birth religion  did  also focus on "works" not just "faith", but that's a separate concern.) Jesus needed to suffer for the world to be saved. And we, his spiritual descendants, had to suffer for the world to be saved.  My belief growing up, then, was that suffer...

Defining Prosperity

I could take this time to write a brief post on the "Green New Deal", of recent acclaim and criticism... But I want to devote the time instead to examining what seems to be the goal of the GND: prosperity. I mean this in the sense that the proponents of the deal mean it: economic prosperity, as measured by equality between citizens and the abolition of classes. Now, we can quibble (correctly) that prosperity is not, in this sense, the real word for it. A better word may be "degradation" or "impoverishment". That is the actual aim, not the named goal. The only way to make everyone equal is not to provide maximum opportunity, but instead, maximum control. Take away the rights of an individual to make their own way in life and they will only be of value to a grand scheme - and to the schemer. Ultimately, this is why socialism is immoral: it shows a shocking, horrifying lack of regard for the individual. The goal of socialism (and specifically,...